Monday, October 8, 2018
Article: [Exclusive] Police conclude "There was no distribution of Goo Hara's video", investigation team says
Source: Korea Ilbo via Nate
1. [+1,785, -112] The fact that he threatened her with the video is a crime already, whether he distributed the video or not. He's going to do this again if they let him get away with it so punish him hard.
2. [+1,622, -80] I'm sure he hasn't distributed it "yet". Isn't the bigger issue here that he threatened her with the video?
3. [+1,269, -77] Jong Bum-ah, this is a dirty look for you
4. [+59, -7] Well I'm glad he didn't distribute it but he should still be punished
5. [+58, -9] What gives me goosebumps to think about is that he'll meet up with his friends later and they'll be like "whoa man, how is she in bed?" and he'll probably tell them everything over drinks while Goo Hara is stuck at home, scared of the watchful eyes of others when she's just the victim.
6. [+36, -3] Either way, he threatened her with it. Anyone who does that deserves jail
7. [+34, -6] Why do I get the feeling that he's going to get off scot free if they don't find any internet traces proving that he distributed the video? How will Goo Hara be compensated for the time she spent shaking in fear after being threatened by that video? When he told Goo Hara's dongsaeng that he'd rather serve time in jail after distributing the video? Just because he never actually did it doesn't mean the video doesn't exist and that he didn't use it to threaten her. How is it fair that a moment of act between two consenting parties now has one shaking in fear and the other making threats?
8. [+31, -5] I'm sure he never distributed it since he wanted to sell it to Dispatch in the first place. Why would he give it away for free?
-
Article: Choi Jong Bum reps reveal more assault pictures and additional Katalks "She is distorting the truth... this is our warning"
Source: TV Report via Nate
1. [+1,148, -52] He thought Dispatch would be on his side, that he wouldn't disappoint... well now all of this is coming back as a boomerang
2. [+935, -64] Get that face off my screen
3. [+741, -159] Oh jeez, good job Goo Hara
4. [+116, -7] Well did you think she wouldn't fight back when you were assaulting her? Fine, let's say it was a double sided assault... aren't you at least embarrassed of your desperate attempts to get all these bloody pictures down?
5. [+113, -5] We get it, you both assaulted each other... but everything you've done after has proven to be pathetic
6. [+70, -3] Yes, we all agree that Goo Hara scratched up your face pretty badly, which is why public sentiment turned against her in the beginning. But because you were the idiot who threatened her with the video, you're now the worse criminal regardless than your face looking like this.
7. [+56, -6] Just thinking of him smoking in the elevator with his face looking like this gives me goosebumps. He was probably looking at the elevator mirror wondering how much money he could get out of this. Or was he already plotting Dispatch at that stage?
8. [+52, -6] He needs to work out more. Goo Hara is about as small as my little sister, how do you get this beat up by her?
9. [+47, -8] He should be lucky Goo Hara didn't dig his eyes out... revenge porno is the worst
10. [+24, -4] He threatened her with the video... For Goo Hara, that's a sense of fear as worse as death. He should be lucky that this is all she did to him. He deserved to die for that one...
-
Article: 'Section TV' Goo Hara to sue ex-boyfriend for blackmail, "Impossible to prosecute him because the video was filmed under consent"
Source: OSEN via Nate
1. [+2,184, -165] That's ridiculous. Even if it was filmed under consent, she didn't consent to him threatening to distribute it so why is it so hard to prosecute someone for that? Why is the law always on the side of the attacker?
2. [+1,454, -148] Consensual?!!!!!!!!....
3. [+1,206, -983] I still don't think Goo Hara's your average kid by the way she scratched his face and body up.
4. [+164, -23] So he can't be prosecuted for a video that was filmed under consent even if he distributed it without her consent? ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ This country is going crazy. No wonder women are out on protests!
5. [+1411, -12] Even if the video was filmed under consent, she did not consent to it being distributed!
6. [+114, -5] So the law is basically not going to protect Goo Hara unless he actually distributed it. He gets off free for making threats as long as he doesn't do it ㅜ
7. [+104, -3] She deleted it and he recovered it and used it to threaten her, how is that not a problem at all?
8. [+99, -14] I remember something a police said: even if people download hidden camera videos, if the police had to prosecute everyone who watched and downloaded it, the majority of Korean men would have to be jailed so it's impossible to prosecute people for it.
-
from Netizen Buzz