Friday, September 27, 2019
Article: Sulli responds to Ha:tfelt revealing her ex-boyfriend's text "You're not an attention wh*re"
Source: Newsen via Nate
1. [+715, -17] From an attention wh*re to another attention wh*re... from a fool to another fool...
2. [+571, -37] She revealed her ex-boyfriend's texts, if that doesn't make her inconsiderate and selfish, then what does?
3. [+339, -20] She didn't reveal the texts to be an attention wh*re, she revealed it as a form of revenge against the guy. She wanted the public to hate on him, like, "look at how he's talking to me, guys"
4. [+26, -3] So many of the WG members don't seem sane
5. [+24, -6] Typical feminist personality... they don't know how to differentiate between having an opinion and being disrespectful. They call themselves "honest" but from a third party perspective, they're just being a b*tch.
6. [+16, -0] You're not a (bigger) attention wh*re (than me)"
7. [+13, -0] What kind of response could you get from asking an attention wh*re whether you're an attention wh*re ㅋㅋㅋ
8. [+12, -0] Texts between your partner and you should be kept private. You have no right to reveal them unless you get consent. Would you like it if he went around telling everyone about your father's scandal?
9. [+9, -2] A show between two attention wh*res ㅋ
10. [+8, -1] By Sulli's standards, she wouldn't think that's attention wh*rish enough ㅋㅋㅋ
-
from Netizen Buzz