Thursday, August 15, 2019
Article: Woman involved in lawsuit for BAP Himchan's 'sexual harassment scandal' sent to prosecutors for racketeering
Source: Newsen via Nate
1. [+332, -82] The sex crime laws are too skewed towards the women's side if you're able to sue for sexual harassment a year after you went to a pension with someone and had skinship with them.
2. [+310, -76] What else is the making of a kkot-baem? They had an interest in each other a few years ago, they hung out, did skinship, went to bed, only to turn around and accuse him of sexual harassment for the money. That's a kkot-baem.
3. [+271, -82] I've only lived 30 years of life and from my experience, women who don't want skinship with you will not go out drinking with you or hang out at a pension with you, and will threaten to sue you for sexual harassment if you make any moves. Why is she filing a year later? ㅋ Feels like feminism has made it so that male celebrities can't even date anymore.
4. [+18, -1] Racketeering must mean she's a kkot-baem
5. [+13, -3] A man's life will not fail if he watches out for women like this
6. [+13, -4] American laws are way harsher than this. A woman could go all the way to a hotel with a man and even get in bed with him but as long as she says "no", it all has to stop. If you keep going, it counts as rape.
7. [+11, -14] Maybe she waited on filing the police report because she felt ashamed. Are the best replies written by ilbe members?
8. [+10, -2] Racketeering means she requested money, tsk tsk
9. [+10, -4] Can we please get harsher sentencing for kkot-baems!!!
10. [+8, -1] No matter how this lawsuit turns out, the water has already been spilled. He needs to take her down for all she's worth.
-
from Netizen Buzz